新闻资讯
科思
/
/
/
Outcomes with bioabsorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stents Insights from randomized trials

Outcomes with bioabsorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stents Insights from randomized trials

  • 分类:学术论文
  • 作者:
  • 来源:
  • 发布时间:2015-08-04 08:54
  • 访问量:

【概要描述】Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) have been shown to be non-inferior to second generation drug eluting stents in recent clinical trials. However, the trials were not powered for individual endpoints and there is concern for increased device thrombosis with BVS.

Outcomes with bioabsorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stents Insights from randomized trials

【概要描述】Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) have been shown to be non-inferior to second generation drug eluting stents in recent clinical trials. However, the trials were not powered for individual endpoints and there is concern for increased device thrombosis with BVS.

  • 分类:学术论文
  • 作者:
  • 来源:
  • 发布时间:2015-08-04 08:54
  • 访问量:
详情

  BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) have been shown to be non-inferior to second generation drug eluting stents in recent clinical trials. However, the trials were not powered for individual endpoints and there is concern for increased device thrombosis with BVS.

  METHODS: We performed a systematic search for randomized clinical trials of BVS versus EES. Efficacy outcomes were target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Safety outcomes were death, myocardial infarction (MI), and device thrombosis. Meta-regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association of device thrombosis with clinical characteristics (percent patients with acute coronary syndrome) and device deployment characteristics (percent with post stent balloon dilation).

  RESULTS: We identified six RCTs that enrolled 3738 patients. When compared with EES, BVS was associated with similar risk of TLR (RR=1.06; 95% CI 0.73-1.54), TVR (RR=1.00; 95% CI 0.74-1.35), death (RR=1.11; 95% CI 0.53-2.33) and cardiovascular death (RR=1.39; 95% CI 0.43-4.43) but numerically higher MI (RR=1.35; 95% CI 0.98-1.86) and definite or probable device thrombosis (RR=2.11; 95% CI 0.99-4.47). In a sensitivity analysis using the Peto odds ratio method, the risk of definite or probable device thrombosis was significantly increased (OR=2.08; 95% CI 1.06-4.08; P=0.03), although this did not reach statistical significance in four other models. The risk of definite or probable device thrombosis with BVS was reduced in trials where more post stent balloon dilation was used and in patients without acute coronary syndrome. Moreover, trial sequential analysis showed that the cumulative z-curve crossed the conventional boundary and not the trial sequential boundary, indicating lack of robust data to support increased definite or probable device thrombosis with BVS.

  CONCLUSIONS: In patients with noncomplex obstructive coronary disease, BVS are comparable to EES for most efficacy and safety outcomesexcept for a numerical increase in device thrombosis and MI. The risk of the latter outcomes was mitigated in trials where more post stent balloon dilation was used and in patients without acute coronary syndrome. Moreover, with only 3738 patients, the trials are underpowered to detect a difference in rare events such as device thrombosis.

中国生物材料学会材料生物力学分会换届大会圆满召开
2022 12-08

中国生物材料学会材料生物力学分会换届大会圆满召开

精准植入 完美心舒——冠脉支架定位系统
2022 11-27

精准植入 完美心舒——冠脉支架定位系统

北京阿迈特与北京航空航天大学联合参与生物医疗器械国家急需高层次人才培养专项
2022 11-26

北京阿迈特与北京航空航天大学联合参与生物医疗器械国家急需高层次人才培养专项

公司信息

北京阿迈特医疗器械有限公司

Beijing Advanced Medical Technologies,Ltd.Inc.

联系我们

地址:北京市大兴区永旺西路26号院中关村医疗器械园11号楼

电话:010-6297-7955             邮箱:amt@ametcorp.com

联系我们

地址:北京市大兴区永旺西路26号院中关村医疗器械园11号楼

电话:010-6297-7955             

邮箱:amt@ametcorp.com